onsdag 8 februari 2012

Boundary Object

Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601-617.

:STS and Information Technologies

A course at Berkeley I-School:
http://blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu/i212-sts-f11/

tisdag 7 februari 2012

Information sharing practices

Dhir, A. et al (2012), Ethnographic Examination for Studying Information Sharing Practices in Rural South Africa, ACHI 2012, The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 68-74.

söndag 29 januari 2012

Luhmann on trust

Luhmann, Niklas (1988) ‘Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives’, in Gambetta, Diego (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 6, pp. 94-107,

fredag 20 januari 2012

Bates' memoir

Bates, M. (2004), Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s: a memoir of student days. Library Trends, 52,(4), 683-701

Focused Ethnography

Knoblauch, H. (2005), Focused Ethnography, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Volume 6, No. 3, Art. 44.

On research practices

Noam, E. (1997). Electronics and the future of the research library. An essay prepared for the 1997 ACRL National Conference Choosing Our Futures. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Serendipity in research

Fine, G. & Deegan, J. (1996). Three principles of serendip: insight, chance and discovery in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies In Education, 9(4).

torsdag 19 januari 2012

Intersubjectivity

Ligorio, MB., Talamo, A. & Pontecorvo, C. (2005), Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairytales, Computers & Education 45, pp. 357–374

torsdag 12 januari 2012

lördag 17 december 2011

Practice theory-artikel

Huizing, A. & Cavanagh, M. (2011). "Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science" Information Research, 16(4) paper 497.

Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science

torsdag 24 november 2011

RIN case studies

Information handling in collaborative research: an exploration of five case studies:
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-accessing-information-resources/collaborative-research-case-studies

"This study, commissioned by RIN and the British Library, comprising of a set of case studies looking at how researchers access, use and disseminate information in collaborations between higher education and business, public and third sector partners."

onsdag 23 november 2011

Uwe Matzat

Of potential interest for my thesis work:

http://umatzat.net/

for instance:


Matzat U. (2004). "Academic Communication and Internet Discussion Groups: Transfer of Information or Creation of Social Contacts?" in: Social Networks, 26, 3: 221-255. (pre-print)

torsdag 17 november 2011

Osemeke Mosindi

Postgraduate student at Northhumbia university. Research topic: Organizations as complex social networks: Understanding information sharing behaviour

Osemeke Mosindi

Library Science - Artists

Library Science - Artists

söndag 16 oktober 2011

social bookmarking sites a review

Laura L. Barnes (lbarnes@istc.illinois.edu)
Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

social bookmarking sites a review

torsdag 6 oktober 2011

Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums

Kanske användbar för kursen Digitala referens- och katalogtjänster:

Smith-Yoshimura, Karen and Cyndi Shein. 2011. Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums Part 1: Site Reviews. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-02.pdf.(.pdf: 6.10MB/174 pp.).

fredag 16 september 2011

Forskning i praktiken

Igår höll jag ett anförande i samband med Svensk biblioteksförenings s.k. Forskardag. Rubriken för mitt anförande är Forskning i praktiken - kunskapssyn, lärande och identitet.

måndag 12 september 2011

Engineering software engineering teams

Engineering software engineering teams

This paper presents novel ideas for understanding how software engineering teams communicate and coordinate. We utilize these ideas to understand how these teams should be constructed and what individuals and managers can do to ensure that teams perform at high levels. Our view is based on numerous observations and interactions with enterprise software engineering teams and influenced by economic models of information sharing. We propose that neither a fully top-down nor bottom-up approach is entirely suitable for teams; rather teams must be cognizant of this issue and work to embrace both models of information flow. This, in turn, can be facilitated by the role of intercessor who seeks to properly guide, direct, and curate both top-down and bottom-up information flows.