onsdag 8 februari 2012
Boundary Object
Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601-617.
:STS and Information Technologies
A course at Berkeley I-School:
http://blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu/i212-sts-f11/
http://blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu/i212-sts-f11/
tisdag 7 februari 2012
Information sharing practices
Dhir, A. et al (2012), Ethnographic Examination for Studying Information Sharing Practices in Rural South Africa, ACHI 2012, The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 68-74.
söndag 29 januari 2012
Luhmann on trust
Luhmann, Niklas (1988) ‘Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives’, in Gambetta, Diego (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 6, pp. 94-107,
fredag 20 januari 2012
Bates' memoir
Bates, M. (2004), Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s: a memoir of student days. Library Trends, 52,(4), 683-701
Focused Ethnography
Knoblauch, H. (2005), Focused Ethnography, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Volume 6, No. 3, Art. 44.
On research practices
Noam, E. (1997). Electronics and the future of the research library. An essay prepared for the 1997 ACRL National Conference Choosing Our Futures. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Serendipity in research
Fine, G. & Deegan, J. (1996). Three principles of serendip: insight, chance and discovery in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies In Education, 9(4).
torsdag 19 januari 2012
Intersubjectivity
Ligorio, MB., Talamo, A. & Pontecorvo, C. (2005), Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairytales, Computers & Education 45, pp. 357–374
torsdag 12 januari 2012
Article on information sharing
Hertzum, M. (2002), The importance of trust in software engineers’ assessment and choice of information sources. Information and Organization, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-18
lördag 17 december 2011
Practice theory-artikel
Huizing, A. & Cavanagh, M. (2011). "Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science" Information Research, 16(4) paper 497.
Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science
Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science
torsdag 24 november 2011
RIN case studies
Information handling in collaborative research: an exploration of five case studies:
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-accessing-information-resources/collaborative-research-case-studies
"This study, commissioned by RIN and the British Library, comprising of a set of case studies looking at how researchers access, use and disseminate information in collaborations between higher education and business, public and third sector partners."
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-accessing-information-resources/collaborative-research-case-studies
"This study, commissioned by RIN and the British Library, comprising of a set of case studies looking at how researchers access, use and disseminate information in collaborations between higher education and business, public and third sector partners."
onsdag 23 november 2011
Uwe Matzat
Of potential interest for my thesis work:
http://umatzat.net/
for instance:
Matzat U. (2004). "Academic Communication and Internet Discussion Groups: Transfer of Information or Creation of Social Contacts?" in: Social Networks, 26, 3: 221-255. (pre-print)
http://umatzat.net/
for instance:
Matzat U. (2004). "Academic Communication and Internet Discussion Groups: Transfer of Information or Creation of Social Contacts?" in: Social Networks, 26, 3: 221-255. (pre-print)
torsdag 17 november 2011
Osemeke Mosindi
Postgraduate student at Northhumbia university. Research topic: Organizations as complex social networks: Understanding information sharing behaviour
Osemeke Mosindi
Osemeke Mosindi
söndag 16 oktober 2011
social bookmarking sites a review
Laura L. Barnes (lbarnes@istc.illinois.edu)
Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
social bookmarking sites a review
Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
social bookmarking sites a review
Etiketter:
Digitala katalog och referenstjänster,
Referensarbete,
Webb 2.0
torsdag 6 oktober 2011
Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums
Kanske användbar för kursen Digitala referens- och katalogtjänster:
Smith-Yoshimura, Karen and Cyndi Shein. 2011. Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums Part 1: Site Reviews. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-02.pdf.(.pdf: 6.10MB/174 pp.).
Smith-Yoshimura, Karen and Cyndi Shein. 2011. Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums Part 1: Site Reviews. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-02.pdf.(.pdf: 6.10MB/174 pp.).
Etiketter:
Digitala katalog och referenstjänster,
Webb 2.0
måndag 19 september 2011
fredag 16 september 2011
Forskning i praktiken
Igår höll jag ett anförande i samband med Svensk biblioteksförenings s.k. Forskardag. Rubriken för mitt anförande är Forskning i praktiken - kunskapssyn, lärande och identitet.
måndag 12 september 2011
Engineering software engineering teams
Engineering software engineering teams
This paper presents novel ideas for understanding how software engineering teams communicate and coordinate. We utilize these ideas to understand how these teams should be constructed and what individuals and managers can do to ensure that teams perform at high levels. Our view is based on numerous observations and interactions with enterprise software engineering teams and influenced by economic models of information sharing. We propose that neither a fully top-down nor bottom-up approach is entirely suitable for teams; rather teams must be cognizant of this issue and work to embrace both models of information flow. This, in turn, can be facilitated by the role of intercessor who seeks to properly guide, direct, and curate both top-down and bottom-up information flows.
This paper presents novel ideas for understanding how software engineering teams communicate and coordinate. We utilize these ideas to understand how these teams should be constructed and what individuals and managers can do to ensure that teams perform at high levels. Our view is based on numerous observations and interactions with enterprise software engineering teams and influenced by economic models of information sharing. We propose that neither a fully top-down nor bottom-up approach is entirely suitable for teams; rather teams must be cognizant of this issue and work to embrace both models of information flow. This, in turn, can be facilitated by the role of intercessor who seeks to properly guide, direct, and curate both top-down and bottom-up information flows.
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)